Cracking Down on Greenwashing

greenwashIn a 2008 article in Natural Life Magazine, I wrote about the deception of greenwashing. I described how companies are exploiting consumers’ willingness to pay extra for green products by using bogus claims on their labels and in their advertising.

And now, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has introduced tighter rules on how manufacturers can label and advertise so-called green products. Under changes proposed last week, the commission’s revised “Green Guides” warn marketers against using labels that make broad claims that cannot be substantiated, like “eco-friendly.” Marketers will now have to qualify their claims on the product packaging and limit them to a specific benefit, such as how much of the product is recycled.

“What companies think green claims mean and what consumers really understand are sometimes two different things,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz in a statement to the media.

The changes include new guidance on marketers’ use of product certifications and seals of approval. There are currently over 300 seals and certifications for marketing green products around the world, with almost 100 used in North America alone. While the commission does not require the use of a specific label, it will consider the seals to be endorsements that should be substantiated by third party verification, which means legitimate certification agencies. Until now, companies have been free to create their own “seals” touting unspecified green claims and affix it them their packaging.

In 2008 and 2009, class-action lawsuits were filed against SC Johnson for using the “Greenlisttm” label on its Windex and Shout cleaning products and representing the label as being a third party certification when it was, in reality the company’s internal rating system. Although the case hasn’t been resolved, and it hasn’t been proven that SC Johnson did anything illegal, the FTC guidelines will prohibit such labels.

The proposed revised Guides provide new advice about carbon offset claims, which I’ve also written about in Natural Life Magazine. Carbon offsets fund projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions in one place in order to counterbalance or “offset” emissions that occur elsewhere. In some cases, the projects involve tree planting, which doesn’t offset anything for 40 or more years – providing the trees even survive. So the updated Guides will advise marketers to disclose if the emission reductions that are being offset will not occur within two years.

The FTC is seeking public comments on the proposed changes until December 10, 2010, after which it will decide which changes to make final.

No Cause for Celebration

A lot of people have wished me “Happy Earth Day™” today. But I’m not feeling like it’s an occasion for celebration. Back in the early days – in the 1970s when we started publishing Natural Life Magazine – there was a heady sense of power to make change, and to set aside one day a year to remind ourselves to work on solving ecological problems.

But now, the problems loom much larger. And they’re global in scope. While we used to think in terms of saving some lakes, cleaning up a river, conserving a specific species of animal, banning a pesticide, we now have a full-blown biodiversity crisis, global climate change and many other issues that have become apparent as a result of having stretched ecological systems to the breaking point. However, politicians and corporate leaders alike are not coming up with real solutions. In fact, instead of solving the problems, in many cases, we’re continuing the behavior that has caused the problems. And that means we’re falling behind, in spite of taking a day each year for the past forty years to plant some trees and wish each other “Happy Earth Day™.” The leader of the band, in Canada at least, has brought along a motley crew of corporate sponsors, including car manufacturers, energy producers, insurance companies, electronics manufacturers and grocery stores. 

I do believe we can change the course of events, although some things are already too far gone and life undoubtedly will be different for our children and grandchildren. If we are to save this planet for human life, governments and corporations will have to act quickly and decisively. And individuals like you and I will have to push them to act. While we’re doing that, we’ll need to be sure our own lifestyle is sustainable (and doesn’t include buying all the so-called green living trinkets I’ve had pitched to me in honor of the day.) As Gandhi said, we must be the change we want to see in the world.

So if you’re marking Earth Day™ in any way, please include some time for sober thought about how we can dig ourselves out of the monstrous mess we’ve created. And then, let’s get started.